A Bitcoin ETF based on futures could be Gensler’s ‘easy’ ticket to victory.

 83 Interactions,  2 Today

The US Securities and Exchange Commission recently approved Volt Crypto’s ETF, and as expected, crypto enthusiasts are ecstatic. This is, however, the closest thing to an ETF that has been approved by the SEC. In doing so, the agency may have invited more confusion rather than clarity among users.

Volt ETF, which was approved on October 5th, will not invest directly in Bitcoin. Instead, it plans to invest at least 80% of its nett assets in “Bitcoin revolution companies,” options, and ETFs with exposure to those companies. The remaining will go into broad equity markets to offset the risk of the portfolio. So, not exactly an ETF, but close. We’ll take it.

In fact, analyst Eric Balchunas had already seen this coming when the SEC delayed the approval of a Bitcoin ETF application earlier this month. At the time, Balchunas had noted,

“Yes, the SEC has kicked can on bitcoin ETF approval BUT that is for the physically-backed ones under ’33 Act. The futures ETFs filed under the ’40 Act (which Genz loves) are very much alive and likely on schedule (we think 75% chance approved in Oct). “

The analyst also provided a list of his odds which included Proshares, Invesco, VanEck, Valkyrie, and Galaxy.

In his prediction, the analyst did not include near-term approvals like Volt’s. However, the prediction was upheld by many. Even so, some offered a different view, in case Balchunas was proven wrong.

See also  Venezuelan international airport will accept Bitcoin payments, according to reports.

Nate Geraci, President of the advisory firm the ETF Store, tweeted,

“@EricBalchunas says 75% chance Bitcoin ETF approved in Oct.
Time to get everyone on record. Yay or nay?
I say yes, though if doesn’t happen we may be waiting til like 2025.”

This misunderstanding stemmed from SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s statement that, because the Investment Company Act [’40 ACT] required investor protection, he is awaiting a staff review of such an ETF filing.

“Especially if they’re limited to CME-traded Bitcoin futures,” he says.

Gensler’s statements have now been followed by the approval of Volt’s BTC ETF. It creates more room for other ETFs to be approved. Meanwhile, it has requested that two issuers withdraw their Ethereum Futures filings, while Bitcoin-centric ones are still being considered.

Geraci added,

“Given that ETF issuers have been tirelessly pursuing Bitcoin ETFs for over eight years now, it seems somewhat disingenuous for the SEC to encourage more filings at this point only to disapprove them. Approving Futures-based Bitcoin ETFs seems like an easy way for the SEC and Chair Gensler to get a ‘win’ in terms of appearing forward-thinking on crypto.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Loading

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *