US lawmakers are most concerned about the Treasury’s response to cryptocurrency.

 71 Interactions,  2 Today

On Friday, exactly 3% of the United States Senate attended the Texas Blockchain Summit, all of whom addressed their colleagues’ understanding of crypto and blockchain.

Senator Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming believes the Treasury Department is a greater threat to blockchain and cryptocurrency innovation in the United States than the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Speaking at the Texas Blockchain Summit in Austin on Friday, Lummis said her recent concerns with the federal agency came from the language concerning brokers of cryptocurrency in the infrastructure bill currently at the center of debate in Congress — Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has expressed her support of the legislation. Under the wording passed by the Senate in August, brokers would have to report digital asset transactions worth more than $10,000 to the Internal Revenue Service.

“The definition that was proposed showed a fundamental misunderstanding of Bitcoin and other digital assets,” said Lummis, who claimed many brokers under the bill with little to no knowledge of their clients would not have the information necessary to file reports.

Exactly 3% of the U.S. Senate was in attendance at the Texas Blockchain Summit. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas spoke about how Bitcoin (BTC) mining can be used to monetize energy generated by oil and gas extraction rather than “flaring” it — burning the excess off as waste fuel. During a severe winter storm in February, Cruz was responding to questions about the state’s power grid when he left Texas for a brief trip to Cancun.

See also  Discover ‘where the huge gains are made' with Ethereum, Cardano, VeChain, and other altcoins.

While Cruz focused primarily on energy issues, fellow Senators John Cornyn and Thom Lummis both suggested that the key to avoiding misunderstandings in legislation such as the crypto amendment to the infrastructure bill was public engagement rather than relying on lawmakers to educate themselves on the subject.

According to Cornyn, the language in the infrastructure bill was a “little bit of a surprise” to members of Congress who didn’t have the knowledge necessary to speak on the subject.

Cruz claimed “there are not five members of the U.S. Senate who could tell you what Bitcoin is,” but Lummis said she observed “enough understanding” following the debate over infrastructure that the language on crypto was likely to be amended in the House version of the bill. Congress is currently struggling to pass long-term legislation surrounding infrastructure, budget reconciliation and the debt ceiling.

“I’ve worked with members of both parties who didn’t have any interest in Bitcoin and digital assets and now we know each other, and now we talk regularly about this,” said Lummis. “I do think there will be some changes to that language, but it’s beginning to show a pattern in my mind by the Treasury Department, the IRS, that we’re really going to have to work on keeping the heavy hand of government at bay.”

See also  Crypto abuse epidemic on the rise, says US Treasury Secretary ,Janet Yellen

Originally scheduled for a vote before Sept. 27, the infrastructure bill, which passed in the Senate has been entangled with a $3.5 trillion House proposal in a political maneuver between progressive and moderate Democrats, coupled with Republican attempts to prevent the government from defaulting on its debt. Lawmakers will likely try to move forward this week.

Subscribe to our newsletter


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *