Why do institutions have zero remorse on their purchases in Bitcoin?

Spread the love

It’s a good time to be part of the crypto business. Not only did Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, walk to hit yet another ATH on the charts, but its market cap also broke the $1 trillion mark yesterday, an amount that was unthinkable just over two months ago.

What led to such a turnaround? Well, the solution is not limited to a single factor alone. But what has been the greatest improvement in the last few months? Perhaps the answer is – Institutional investment.

Today, according to many, the flood of institutional investment that we’ve seen recently is due to MicroStrategy declaring Bitcoin as its main treasury reserve asset back in August 2020. The “Michael Saylor Effect” was named by a newsletter. Ergo, it’s worth evaluating if MicroStrategy, or the other public companies that placed Bitcoin in their balance sheets, have any regrets.

After all, there were those who raised an eyebrow when MicroStrategy made a big bitcoin decision. Huge danger, some have said. Not to the world’s largest business intelligence firm, which is also publicly traded. For once, crypto-sceptics and business non-believers were united in their ridicule.


RECOMMENDED READ:  Institutions help drive rally as Bitcoin ETP volumes surge 50%

To consider and answer this question, the Bitcoin Treasures Index of Ecoinometrics is a good place to start. The index accounts for a large number of public entities holding a crypto-asset on their balance sheets. This includes the likes of MicroStrategy, Marathon Patent Party, Square, Riot Blockchain and Tesla.

According to the same,

“…if an investor put capital in the Treasuries Index starting from the beginning of the 3rd halving, a nice 12x profit would be bankable in less than a year.”

Remember that too – while MSTR is up by 600 per cent, Marathon is up by 5500 per cent, and Riot blockchain is up by 3500 per cent.

Here, it is worth presenting proof that it was MicroStrategy that really opened the door to institutional investment in Bitcoin. For the same reason, the Average Transaction Size statistic is worth looking at.

The same reached a high of $440,000 a few days ago on February 16. By the way, this was the same day that MicroStrategy revealed plans to buy more Bitcoin. In fact, the Average Transaction Size increased by more than 14 per cent in 24 hours.

Any questions as to whether MicroStrategy would get back to Bitcoin were put to rest on the 16th after the firm revealed that it would sell $600 million worth of convertible senior notes to raise funds to purchase more Bitcoin. It is also worth noting that MSTR’s shares declined by a relatively insignificant 7 per cent as soon as the news came to the fore, despite the fact that it increased by 5 per cent in pre-market trading.

RECOMMENDED READ:  Casa Releases Self-Custody Bitcoin Wallet Focused on Privacy

For several, however, the depreciation was merely a blip, with most believing that this was the development that eventually moved BTC past the $50,000 mark.

What is more, lately, the 30-day correlation coefficient has highlighted the striking relationship between the world’s largest cryptocurrency and the assets listed above. The same was emphasised by IntoTheBlock’s correlation matrix, which also revealed that Marathon Patent Party, MicroStrategy and Square all share a coefficient greater than 0.9.

Source: IntoTheBlock

Other ratios also seemed to suggest something similar. Adding the Crypto-Analytics platform to its current newsletter,

“The similarities between Bitcoin and crypto-related equities are also visible in risk-adjusted indicators such as the Sharpe and Sortino ratio.”

These ratios may be used to measure the performance of equity investments, in this case crypto-related equities, versus risk-free investments.

The higher the Sharpe or Sortino ratio, the better the risk-adjusted return of the asset. According to IntoTheBlock, the likes of MicroStrategy and Marathon have both reported positive ratios on the above scale, in line with how well Bitcoin is doing.

Source: IntoTheBlock

Therefore, one might say that while Bitcoin has mounted on maps, so do these firms. In fact, it would be easy to say the contrary, with the connection between the two possibly angling towards a relationship.

RECOMMENDED READ:  Oaktree Capital Chairman Gets Warmer for Crypto—Son Said To Owns Sufficient Bitcoin for the Household

This brings us to the question, who needs the other more, Bitcoin or Institutions? That’s a tough question, but it could be better answered from this viewpoint,

“… institutions coming into Bitcoin might be old news now. Institutions adding Bitcoin to stay relevant, however, could be the next big narrative going forward.”

 374 Interactions,  2 today

How the competition between Ethereum  and  Bitcoin as a store of value is shaping up

Ethereum's stock has risen by more than 8 percent in the last 24 hours and is now traded above $1,500. Read more

How Ethereum whales’ movement is impacting its price

Ether's worth has shifted quickly over the last 24 hours. After a breach of more than $1,500 in the late Read more

 Bitcoin’s hodlers role in market cycle

Bitcoin's valuation is in line with the current trading cycle. Both fundamental and technical experts will inform you that there Read more

Aave, Chainlink, Dash Price Movement Analysis for 7th March,2021

The altcoin market is once again on a downward spiral, with the price of most cryptocurrencies dropping, at the time Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact Us